any Latin American artists, when pondering
on their identity, doubting, have convinced themselves that our truest option of
authenticity is our colonialist trauma, held by a chain of Catholic feelings. Our painting,
architecture and social laws are continuously undermined by deeply-ingrained
involuntary traditions that are usually not subject to close study. Nineteenth Century
colonial painting has exerted significant influence in both the highest and lowest social
levels as to the manner in which art is appreciated, perhaps due to an eternal need of
worshipping icons. Baroque and Mannerist expressions are the dominant esthetics that
characterize Latin American feeling. In art, these feelings are always represented by
Christian suffering, examined from multiple perspectives. Suffering has been the
central theme of Western art since the Renaissance, as well as that pertaining to
loneliness, nostalgia, sadness, repression, anguish, fear, and guilt complexes. A painter
such as Matisse would never have flourished in Latin America, since serenity and a
celebration of life were the bases of his work. It seems as though the art generated by
the colonialist culture tradition had no interest in the ideas of the developed world.
B rbaro Rivas þbarbarouslyþ addressed the religious motif in his painting, involving his
immediate environment and the simple life of our country towns. His works are
authentic poetic songs, where loneliness and poverty are overcome by an nave
happiness, sprung from a unique faith. During the last few years, a contemporary
artistic trend to retake Christianity has been steadily growing in Venezuela, in addition
to a quest for the anthropological. I cannot tell whether these are priority changes or
authentic efforts to describe our own reality.
Forms of the Religious Element
Artists such as Antonio Lazo, Ernesto Le¢n, Claudio Perna, Hern ndez DþJes£s,
Hctor Fuenmayor, Rolando Pe¤a, Carlos Zerpa or Hern ndez Diez are all seekers of
the mystery of the representation of Christ, Jos Gregorio Hern ndez, the Sacred Heart
of Jesus, or Sim¢n Bol¡var, another leader of our popular religious expression.
Allegorically, Antonio Lazo develops all these icons. They are the central theme of his
painting, which he performs þdramatizing that which is dramatic in itselfþ, using all the
expressionist resources of realism. Lazo has been able to integrate multiple disciplines
into his work, as well as a diversity of objects and daring constructions in
two-dimentional support; perhaps, in this manner, he ensures that his representations
are characterized by a greater realism. Calligraphy, the naked expression of drawing,
is continuously used as a pictorial recourse. His energetic and agitated brushwork solely
stops before the representation of the workþs central figure, paying unnecessary respect
to the original iconography. Thus, Lazo is presented as a an enthusiast, a lover of the
pictorial tradition, of history and reality. He is a painter who lives for seeking (or
expressing) its strength. This search is an irrepressible action in the context of Latin
American Art. It is interesting to point out that Lazoþs painting had an unfinished
quality during the sixties and seventies, when he began to explore the present. It is
important to note how, from a constructive viewpoint, Lazo began to grant his work
during the eighties -the promiscuous decade- a special dimension based on recycling the
work of a group of totally unprejudiced artists, such as Flix Perdomo, Ernesto Le¢n,
Oscar Pellegrino, Onofre Fr¡as, and his much-admired Tapies. Such reclycling is
significant, since it liberates our artist from the pressure exerted by the Venezuelan
masters of the sixties. In his work, Lazo conveys his strength through the monumental
and the heroic, elements which are also fundamental in the work of Anselm, Kiefer and
Beuys.
Looking Towards Europe
It is not my intention to create a negative referential climate between Kiefer and
Lazo; on the contrary, I am rather inclined toward a reflexive approach between these
artists and us. The abyss that separates one from the other is totally cultural. Kieferþs
sensitivity reminds us of the Nineteenth Century French Romantics, for his
þmelancholy and delicately masochistic spiritþ. Kieferþs strife is to liberate the
repressed emotions of Nazism; he revives alchemy and is diabolically interested in
þevoking metaphors of mystical creativityþ. He dramatizes, as Mephistopheles, his
thematic and historical material, aiming at absurdity and irony: his work is filled with
þpoisonous meanings that expel toxic poetic steam.þ Kiefer moves us deeply, not only
for his pictorial daring, but also for the other very special elements that are inseparable
from his life and culture; among these, his relationship with life and death, desire and
abandonment; his multiple historical associations, the despairing affirmation of his
German identity, which entraps him in old sickly obsessions and, likewise, seals his
historical oppression. He always opted for self-destruction, in the manner of
Fassbinder. The history of German art has been consolidated through the works of
many Kiefers, many Contemporary Art Museums and hundreds of artists that have
sliced off their ears. In Venezuela, with an art history that is different, fresh, nave,
convulsed and still adolescent, only recently have we begun, as of Rever¢n, to build a
feverish destiny at our own risk. In Lazoþs work, we find a celebration of the
impetuousness that characterizes us. But the expression of our history through the arts
remains a secret, aphotic and reticent expression. We must write new scripts. In our
current reality, our colonialist situation does not differ much from that of the past
century; it remains a trauma that cannot find the right answer.
Select one of these pictures to see a bigger image
This article is reproduced from the "Papel Literario" of EL NACIONAL with
permission of its editors